Bachelorarbeit, 2020
69 Seiten, Note: 1
1. Introduction
1.1 Overview
1.2 Research objectives and questions
2. Concepts and measurements
2.1 Culture
2.2 Institutions
3. Research design and methodology
4. Literature review
4.1 Economics
4.2 Historical events and development
4.3 Public sector
4.4 Sociology and gender studies
4.5 International business
4.6 Corporate governance
4.7 Ethics, CSR and reputation
4.8 Finance
4.9 Summary of the results
5. Discussion
5.1 Findings of the literature review
5.2 Future research
5.3 Limitations
6. Conclusions
The primary objective of this thesis is to systematically review and synthesize existing scholarly literature that examines the intersection of culture and institutions. By deconstructing how these two pillars influence one another and impact third-party factors such as economic performance, entrepreneurship, and corporate behavior, the work aims to uncover the complex mechanisms driving these interactions and identify prevailing research trends.
1.1 Overview
Over the last few decades, an increasing scholarly interest in the topics of culture and institutions has developed and led to a stark rise in published related work. Especially since the early 2000s, the two topics have gained significant ground in a variety of academic disciplines and caused an increase of available literature, which is also confirmed by the results of our search process. Cultural or institutional theory fits into several scientific fields ranging from psychology and sociology to law and economics.
Views on culture and institutions vastly differ. While some academics see them primarily as endogenous (e.g., North, 1990), others perceive them as exogenously given and representing the equilibrium of a game (e.g., Greif, 2006). Bowles (1998), on the contrary, views them as exogenous too, although they lead to the creation of endogenous preferences in society. A change of cultural and institutional settings, however, can be both exogenous (e.g., shocks, like revolutions, political coups and annexations of new territory) and endogenous (e.g., slow change over time; Ogilvie, 2007). In addition, research is also still not completely conclusive about which and how variables affect the formation of culture and institutions. Likely effects stem from geographic factors (climate, resources, food, etc.), language, education, war, pandemics and available technology, amongst others (Alesina & Giuliano, 2015). On the other hand, theory of new institutional economics highlights the implication of path dependence for both concepts (North, 1990). Path dependence suggests that history matters for current and future decisions and potential outcomes. Similarly, random events, in contrast to systematic forces, can have significant impacts (David, 1985). It so implies a certain lock-in effect created by prior events which can figuratively speaking, make it challenging to leave an already adopted path even if there exist superior ones. Also, because culture and institutions interact, they create space for multiple stable outcomes (Bowles, 1998). In sum, as these statements suggest, culture and institutions have the potential to significantly influence not only each other but also many other outcomes.
1. Introduction: Introduces the growing scholarly relevance of the intersection between culture and institutions, outlines the divergent academic views, and defines the core research objectives.
2. Concepts and measurements: Discusses the definitions, dimensions, and empirical implementation of culture and institutions in academic research.
3. Research design and methodology: Details the systematic literature review process, including search strategies, criteria for inclusion, and the categorization of selected articles.
4. Literature review: Provides a thematic synthesis of articles classified into eight categories, ranging from economics and history to corporate governance and finance.
5. Discussion: Evaluates the definitions used, synthesizes the findings regarding the intersection of the two concepts, suggests directions for future research, and addresses study limitations.
6. Conclusions: Summarizes the contributions of the thesis and reiterates the significance of studying the nexus between culture and institutions for future scientific inquiry.
National culture, institutions, social interaction, path dependence, economic development, corporate governance, systematic literature review, cultural economics, mutual feedback, social capital, institutional voids, corporate social responsibility, behavioral incentives, cross-national studies, institutional change.
The thesis focuses on reviewing and synthesizing existing academic literature to understand how cultural and institutional theories interact and are jointly applied across various scientific fields.
The work covers economics, historical events, the public sector, sociology and gender studies, international business, corporate governance, ethics/CSR, and finance.
The overarching research question investigates how and in which areas cultural and institutional theory have been jointly applied in prior scholarly literature.
The author applies a systematic literature review, using specified search engines and criteria to identify, categorize, and synthesize high-quality peer-reviewed articles.
The main body examines the nexus of culture and institutions, exploring their mutual feedback effects, their influence on social and economic outcomes, and their role in determining behavioral incentives.
Key terms include national culture, institutions, social interaction, path dependence, economic development, and corporate governance.
They act as complementary forces that create and shape preferences; formal institutions regulate economic activity, while culture can influence the effectiveness of these rules or even act as a substitute for them.
Path dependence implies that historical cultural and institutional events create a "lock-in" effect, making it difficult for societies or organizations to shift to superior arrangements even when they exist.
The thesis focuses on national or societal culture because organizational culture operates under different theoretical frameworks and empirical constraints, which would exceed the intended scope of the analysis.
Der GRIN Verlag hat sich seit 1998 auf die Veröffentlichung akademischer eBooks und Bücher spezialisiert. Der GRIN Verlag steht damit als erstes Unternehmen für User Generated Quality Content. Die Verlagsseiten GRIN.com, Hausarbeiten.de und Diplomarbeiten24 bieten für Hochschullehrer, Absolventen und Studenten die ideale Plattform, wissenschaftliche Texte wie Hausarbeiten, Referate, Bachelorarbeiten, Masterarbeiten, Diplomarbeiten, Dissertationen und wissenschaftliche Aufsätze einem breiten Publikum zu präsentieren.
Kostenfreie Veröffentlichung: Hausarbeit, Bachelorarbeit, Diplomarbeit, Dissertation, Masterarbeit, Interpretation oder Referat jetzt veröffentlichen!

