Bachelorarbeit, 2024
67 Seiten, Note: 1,3
This paper analyzes the narratives surrounding the US military's decision to deploy data-based military technology, focusing on counterfactual and hypothetical justifications. It examines how these narratives shape perceptions of the technology's effectiveness and address criticisms regarding its implications. The analysis uses a cultural-scientific perspective on decision-making to understand the context and motivations behind these narratives.
Introduction: The introduction establishes the paper's focus on examining counterfactual and hypothetical narratives used to justify the US military's adoption of data-based military technologies. It highlights the cultural-scientific approach to understanding decision-making processes behind the integration of AI and other advanced technologies into warfare. The introduction also briefly touches upon the historical context of the "Global War on Terror" and its influence on the development and deployment of these technologies, setting the stage for a deeper exploration of the main arguments and themes in the following chapters.
Practices of decision making: This chapter would delve into the theoretical framework of decision-making processes within the US military concerning the adoption of new technologies. It would likely examine the various stakeholders involved, the bureaucratic procedures, and the influence of political and strategic considerations on the final decision. The chapter would likely explore models of decision-making and how they might relate to the specific case of data-based military technology.
Historic Context: This chapter analyzes the historical context surrounding the decision to adopt data-based military technologies. It would likely focus on the "Global War on Terror" and its unique challenges, including the difficulties in distinguishing combatants from non-combatants, resulting in high civilian casualties. This chapter would explain how these challenges drove the need for improved intelligence gathering and analysis, paving the way for the adoption of data-based technologies to enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of military operations. The chapter might discuss the limitations of traditional methods and the perceived advantages of AI-driven solutions.
Terminology: This chapter would likely define key terms and concepts related to data-based military technologies, AI, and autonomous weapons systems. It would establish a common understanding of terminology crucial to understanding the subsequent analysis of counterfactual and hypothetical narratives.
This document provides a language preview of an academic paper analyzing narratives surrounding the US military's decision to deploy data-based military technology, focusing on counterfactual and hypothetical justifications.
The key themes include counterfactual narratives justifying the technology's use, hypothetical narratives shaping future warfare expectations with AI, the "Global War on Terror's" influence, ethical implications of autonomous weapons, and a critical analysis of justifications for deploying data-based military technology.
Counterfactual narratives refer to arguments that attempt to justify the use of data-based military technology by suggesting what would have happened had the technology not been used (e.g., more civilian casualties).
Hypothetical narratives refer to arguments that describe potential future scenarios of warfare using AI, often used to shape expectations and justify further development and deployment of such technologies.
The "Global War on Terror" is presented as a historical context that influenced the adoption of data-based military technologies due to challenges like distinguishing combatants from non-combatants and the perceived need for improved intelligence gathering.
The document mentions ethical implications of autonomous weapons systems, particularly related to the lack of clear definitions and potential for unintended consequences.
This chapter delves into the theoretical framework of decision-making processes within the US military regarding the adoption of new technologies, including stakeholders, procedures, and the influence of political and strategic considerations.
This chapter defines key terms and concepts related to data-based military technologies, AI, and autonomous weapons systems to establish a common understanding for the subsequent analysis.
The subtopics in the first counterfactual section are "Reinvention of accuracy" and "Dual Use," related to the argument that the technology reduces civilian casualties.
The subtopics include a second counterfactual related to safeguard and policy, international ban problems, and human meaningful control.
Der GRIN Verlag hat sich seit 1998 auf die Veröffentlichung akademischer eBooks und Bücher spezialisiert. Der GRIN Verlag steht damit als erstes Unternehmen für User Generated Quality Content. Die Verlagsseiten GRIN.com, Hausarbeiten.de und Diplomarbeiten24 bieten für Hochschullehrer, Absolventen und Studenten die ideale Plattform, wissenschaftliche Texte wie Hausarbeiten, Referate, Bachelorarbeiten, Masterarbeiten, Diplomarbeiten, Dissertationen und wissenschaftliche Aufsätze einem breiten Publikum zu präsentieren.
Kostenfreie Veröffentlichung: Hausarbeit, Bachelorarbeit, Diplomarbeit, Dissertation, Masterarbeit, Interpretation oder Referat jetzt veröffentlichen!
Kommentare